E-journals are constantly evolving and adding new features, however, scholars’ views of desired features of scholarly e-articles have not received much attention. Scholars’ opinions were studied as part of two scholarly reading surveys conducted in Finland in 2016 and internationally in 2018. Respondents were asked “What features would you like to see in e-scholarly articles in the future” and “How have your reading practices changed in the last few years and how do you expect them to change”. A qualitative thematic analysis of 588 open-ended comments to these questions was performed. Themes discussed in open ended comments concern availability and accessibility; readability, searchability, findability, and discoverability; sharing and collaboration affordances; and seamlessness between reading and writing. Respondents also discussed affordances such as more visual materials, more interactivity, easier export of references, links to original research data, open commenting, open peer review, possibility to update articles, links to authors’ social media sites, and templates for secondary and meta-analysis. Users’ discussion of affordances for finding, discovering, sharing, and handling information provide insights to publishers, libraries, and web designers.

中文翻译：

---

学术电子文章的期望供给：基于开放式答案的学者观点

电子期刊在不断发展和增加新的功能，然而，学者们对学术电子文章的期望特征的看法并没有受到太多关注。作为 2016 年在芬兰和 2018 年在国际上进行的两项学术阅读调查的一部分，学者们的意见得到了研究。受访者被问及“您希望在未来的电子学术文章中看到哪些特点”和“您的阅读习惯发生了哪些变化在过去的几年里，你希望他们如何改变”。对这些问题的 588 条开放式评论进行了定性主题分析。开放式评论中讨论的主题涉及可用性和可访问性；可读性、可搜索性、可查找性和可发现性；共享和协作功能；以及阅读和写作之间的无缝衔接。受访者还讨论了诸如更多视觉材料、更多交互性、更容易导出参考文献、原始研究数据链接、开放评论、开放同行评审、更新文章的可能性、作者社交媒体网站链接以及二级和元模板等可供性-分析。用户对查找、发现、共享和处理信息的可供性的讨论为出版商、图书馆和网页设计师提供了见解。