In the Airhelp v SAS case (23 March 2021, C-28/20), the Court of Justice reconciled the interests of workers and passengers by stating that an announced strike by airline employees did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance in the sense of Article 5.3 Regulation 261/2004. This gave passengers a right to compensation and the Court safeguarded the right to strike in the event of a social dispute. The Court thereby invoked the right to collective action in Article 28 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. This case law was also confirmed in the Eurowings ruling (6 October 2021, C 613/20) concerning a secondary strike.

在Airhelp 诉 SAS案（2021 年 3 月 23 日，C-28/20）中，法院调和了工人和乘客的利益，声明航空公司员工宣布罢工并不构成第 5.3 条意义上的特殊情况条例 261/2004。这赋予了乘客获得赔偿的权利，法院保障了在发生社会纠纷时罢工的权利。因此，法院援引了《欧盟基本权利宪章》第 28 条中的集体诉讼权。该判例法也在Eurowings关于二次罢工的裁决（2021 年 10 月 6 日，C 613/20）中得到确认。