ABSTRACT

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is a doctrine motivated by good intentions. Yet an overriding concern with the successful consolidation of R2P as a norm, as well as the institutionalisation of R2P with academic and policy circles, has led to an excessive focus on the doctrine itself, rather than the atrocities meant to be motivating it. These limitations and shortcomings are examined and subsequently worked through in reference to the 2011 Libyan intervention. It is argued there should be less concern with norm development, and more explicit engagement with the responsibilities that come with supporting the doctrine.

中文翻译：

---

保护责任的道德不可触碰性

摘要

保护责任 (R2P) 是一种出于善意的学说。然而，对于将 R2P 成功整合为规范以及 R2P 在学术界和政策界的制度化的压倒一切的关注导致过度关注该学说本身，而不是旨在激励它的暴行。参考 2011 年的利比亚干预，检查并随后解决了这些限制和缺点。有人认为应该减少对规范发展的关注，而应该更明确地参与支持该学说的责任。