Previous studies have observed that asynchronous online interaction relies on sequence organization in the same way as spoken interaction, but that its sequential implicativeness might sometimes become looser. This means that advice-seeking may be followed by something other than advice, without it being treated as problematic. This study investigates such instances on Reddit, utilizing the Conversation Analytic concepts of affiliative stance and action alignment. The analysis led to two major observations. First, based on the affiliative stance, there are three ways of reacting to an advice-seeking post: accepting, negotiating, and denying the validity of the advice-seeking. Second, most responses that did not align with the action did align with the overall activity or another action made relevant by the preceding message. Based on the analysis, this article offers a system for classifying responses to advice-seeking that do not give advice.

先前的研究观察到，异步在线交互与口语交互一样依赖序列组织，但其序列含义有时可能会变得更加松散。这意味着寻求建议之后可能会出现建议以外的其他内容，而不会被视为有问题。本研究利用从属立场和行动对齐的对话分析概念调查 Reddit 上的此类实例。分析导致了两个主要观察结果。首先，基于从属立场，对寻求建议的帖子有三种反应方式：接受、谈判和否认寻求建议的有效性。其次，大多数与行动不一致的回应确实与整体活动或与前面消息相关的其他行动一致。根据分析，