当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Family Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Individual differences in timing of susceptibility to adverse effects of family dysfunction.
Journal of Family Psychology ( IF 3.302 ) Pub Date : 2022-02-10 , DOI: 10.1037/fam0000970
Jay Belsky 1 , Signe H Andersen 2
Affiliation  

Do adolescents vary in the timing of their susceptibility to family-related adversity? Does early exposure to family dysfunction affect later adolescent plasticity? To address these two questions an influence statistic, DFBETAS, was used to capture degree to which 605,344 Danish children (294,479 females, 5.21% immigrants; race/ethnicity information not available in Danish registry) appeared susceptible to the adverse effects of household dysfunction measured annually at ages 0-5 and 13-18 on problematic development at age 18-19. Degree of susceptibility to family-adversity effects proved generally consistent across periods (γ = 0.5195), though for a not insubstantial number of adolescents this was decidedly not the case, as they were highly dissimilar (N = 80,408, 13.28%). Also, greater early-adversity susceptibility did not forecast reduced adolescent susceptibility, as has been hypothesized, but just the opposite. Future research can address the generalizability of these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

对家庭功能障碍不利影响的易感时间的个体差异。

青少年对家庭相关逆境的易感时间是否不同?早期接触家庭功能障碍会影响以后的青少年可塑性吗?为了解决这两个问题,使用影响统计数据 DFBETAS 来获取 605,344 名丹麦儿童(294,479 名女性,5.21% 移民;丹麦登记处未提供种族/民族信息)似乎易受每年测量的家庭功能障碍的不利影响的程度在 0-5 岁和 13-18 岁时,在 18-19 岁时有问题的发展。事实证明,对家庭逆境影响的易感程度在各个时期基本一致(γ = 0.5195),尽管对于相当数量的青少年来说,情况显然并非如此,因为他们非常不同(N = 80,408, 13.28%)。还,正如假设的那样,更大的早期逆境易感性并不能预测青少年易感性的降低,但恰恰相反。未来的研究可以解决这些发现的普遍性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2022-02-10
down
wechat
bug