Despite their differences, consumer and business Chapter 7 cases are administered by the same trustees under the same rules. We advance normative arguments against this one-size-fits-all approach, buttressed by novel empirical research. Two policy changes are appropriate: (1) trustee compensation should differ by case type, and (2) trustees should specialize.

 

中文翻译：

---

一刀切：第 7 章受托人的逾期改革

尽管存在差异，消费者和企业第 7 章案件由相同的受托人根据相同的规则管理。我们提出了反对这种一刀切的方法的规范性论据，并得到了新颖的实证研究的支持。有两个政策变化是适当的：(1) 受托人补偿应因案件类型而异，(2) 受托人应专业化。