The Academic Resilience Scale (ARS) was developed to measure resilience factors in educational contexts. However, there is no clarity on whether the scale could be used as a measure of unidimensional academic resilience scores or just to obtain multidimensional academic resilience factors. How a scale is scored can affect the validity of inferences based on scores obtained by using the scale in research and practice. This study uses confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and ancillary bifactor measures to examine the dimensionality of the scale. There was no sufficient support for using the scale to obtain unidimensional academic resilience score. Rather, the scale should only be considered as a measure of multiple dimensions of academic resilience factors.

学术复原力量表 (ARS) 旨在衡量教育环境中的复原力因素。然而，尚不清楚该量表是否可以用作衡量一维学业弹性分数或仅用于获得多维学业弹性因子。量表的评分方式会影响基于在研究和实践中使用量表获得的分数进行推断的有效性。本研究使用验证性因子分析 (CFA) 和辅助双因子测量来检查量表的维度。没有足够的支持使用该量表来获得一维的学业弹性分数。相反，该量表应仅被视为对学术弹性因素的多个维度的衡量。