The primary aim of this research was to test the relation between wisdom and transgression victims' prosocial (forgiving), neutral (inhibiting), and antisocial (unforgiving) post-transgression responses (PTRs) in applied contexts. In addition, this research tested the role of two boundary conditions, transgressors' intent (Study 1 and 2) and transgression frequency (Study 2), in victims' tailoring their PTRs to targeted situations. We predicted that the relation between wisdom and victims' PTRs would vary as a function of these two contextual factors. Specifically, we predicted that wiser victims would respond more prosocially and less antisocially, but they would also tailor their responses to the context to facilitate adaptive responses. Two experiments that varied in design, setting (laboratory vs. online), and nature of transgression (personal vs. extrapersonal) largely supported the hypotheses and systematically replicated the findings. The overall pattern of responses provides empirical evidence for the theorized, but rarely tested, association between wisdom and prosocial responses. Wiser individuals also appeared particularly forgiving toward trivial offenses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

人际关系违规后的社会决策：智者之言。

本研究的主要目的是测试智慧与越界受害者在应用情境中的亲社会（宽容）、中立（抑制）和反社会（不宽容）越界后反应 (PTR) 之间的关系。此外，这项研究还测试了两个边界条件的作用，即违规者的意图（研究 1 和 2）和违规频率（研究 2），在受害者根据目标情况调整 PTR 时的作用。我们预测智慧与受害者 PTR 之间的关系会随着这两个背景因素的变化而变化。具体来说，我们预测更聪明的受害者会做出更亲社会的反应，而不是反社会的反应，但他们也会根据环境调整自己的反应，以促进适应性反应。两个设计、设置（实验室与在线）不同的实验，越轨的性质（个人与超个人）​​在很大程度上支持了假设并系统地复制了研究结果。总体反应模式为智慧和亲社会反应之间的理论化但很少经过检验的关联提供了经验证据。更聪明的人似乎对微不足道的罪行也特别宽容。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。