当前位置: X-MOL 学术Erwerbs-Obstbau › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Comprehensive Evaluation Analysis of the Fruit Quality in Actinidia eriantha Pollinated with Different Pollen Donors Based on the Membership Function Method
Erwerbs-Obstbau ( IF 1.3 ) Pub Date : 2022-01-10 , DOI: 10.1007/s10341-021-00620-3
Guanglian Liao 1, 2 , Xiaobiao Xu 1, 2 , Zhiqiang Jiang 2 , Yanqun He 2 , Min Zhong 2 , Chunhui Huang 2 , Xueyan Qu 2
Affiliation  

Flowers of novel female kiwifruit cultivar ‘Ganmi 6’ (diploid Actinidia eriantha) were hand pollinated with pollen from each of five males: ‘XM 11’ (diploid A. chinensis), ‘YS 1’ (diploid A. chinensis), ‘WF 1’ (diploid A. eriantha), ‘MG 15’ (diploid A. eriantha) and ‘FX 2’ (CK, hexaploid A. deliciosa, widely used as pollinating male of A. eriantha). The resulting fruits were harvested when SSC reached 6.5% and quality was measured when it reached an edible state at room temperature. When harvested, fruit from pollination by ‘WF1’ had a 100% fruit setting rate. The fruit weights were significantly higher following ‘MG 15’ and ‘WF 1’ pollination. No significant differences were found among pollen treatments in fruit shape index and small width. However, there were significant differences in fruit weight, soluble sugar content, titratable acid content, dry matter and ascorbic acid content. Comprehensive evaluation of male pollination plants was determined by membership function method with the fruit setting rate and fruit quality, the results were as follows: ‘WF 1’ > ‘XM 11’ > ‘MG 15’ > ‘FX 2’ > ‘YS 1’. ‘WF 1’ is the most suitable for pollinating ‘Ganmi 6’ in industry.



中文翻译:

基于隶属函数法的不同供粉者授粉猕猴桃果实品质综合评价分析

新的雌性猕猴桃品种'甘蜜 6'(二倍体猕猴桃)的花用来自五个雄性中的每一个的花粉进行人工授粉:'XM 11'(二倍体 A. chinensis)、'YS 1'(二倍体A. chinensis)、'WF 1'(二倍体A. eriantha)、'MG 15'(二倍体A. eriantha)和 'FX 2'(CK,六倍体A. deliciosa,广泛用作A. eriantha 的授粉雄性)。当SSC达到6.5%时收获果实,在室温下达到可食用状态时测量品质。收获时,'WF1'授粉的果实坐果率为100%。'MG 15'和'WF 1'授粉后果实重量显着增加。花粉处理的果实形状指数和小宽度无显着差异。但在单果重、可溶性糖含量、可滴定酸含量、干物质和抗坏血酸含量方面存在显着差异。雄性授粉植株的坐果率和果实品质采用隶属函数法综合评价,结果为:'WF 1' > 'XM 11' > 'MG 15' > 'FX 2' > 'YS 1 '。'WF 1'是工业上最适合为'干米6'授粉的。

更新日期:2022-01-11
down
wechat
bug