Configurations of mother-child and father-child attachment as predictors of internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems: An individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.,New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Configurations of mother-child and father-child attachment as predictors of internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems: An individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.
New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2022-01-10 , DOI: 10.1002/cad.20450
Or Dagan ₁ , Carlo Schuengel ₂ , Marije L Verhage ₂ , Marinus H van IJzendoorn _{3,

4} , Abraham Sagi-Schwartz ₅ , Sheri Madigan ₆ , Robbie Duschinsky ₄ , Glenn I Roisman ₇ , Kristin Bernard ₁ , Marian Bakermans-Kranenburg ₂ , Jean-François Bureau ₈ , Brenda L Volling ₉ , Maria S Wong ₁₀ , Cristina Colonnesi ₁₁ , Geoffrey L Brown ₁₂ , Rina D Eiden ₁₃ , R M Pasco Fearon ₁₄ , Mirjam Oosterman ₂ , Ora Aviezer ₅ , E Mark Cummings ₁₅ ,

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, New York, USA.
Section of Clinical Child and Family Studies, Department of Educational and Family Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Research Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK.
Center for the Study of Child Development and School of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA.
School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Michigan, USA.
School of Social Sciences, Communication & Humanities, Endicott College, Maryland, USA.
Research Institute of Child Development and Education, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Georgia, USA.
Department of Psychology, Penn State University, Pennsylvania, USA.
Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.

An unsettled question in attachment theory and research is the extent to which children's attachment patterns with mothers and fathers jointly predict developmental outcomes. In this study, we used individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis to assess whether early attachment networks with mothers and fathers are associated with children's internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems. Following a pre-registered protocol, data from 9 studies and 1,097 children (mean age: 28.67 months) with attachment classifications to both mothers and fathers were included in analyses. We used a linear mixed effects analysis to assess differences in children's internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems as assessed via the average of both maternal and paternal reports based on whether children had two, one, or no insecure (or disorganized) attachments. Results indicated that children with an insecure attachment relationship with one or both parents were at higher risk for elevated internalizing behavioral problems compared with children who were securely attached to both parents. Children whose attachment relationships with both parents were classified as disorganized had more externalizing behavioral problems compared to children with either one or no disorganized attachment relationship with their parents. Across attachment classification networks and behavioral problems, findings suggest (a) an increased vulnerability to behavioral problems when children have insecure or disorganized attachment to both parents, and (b) that mother-child and father-child attachment relationships may not differ in the roles they play in children's development of internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems.

中文翻译：

母子和父子依恋的配置作为内化和外化行为问题的预测因子：个体参与者数据 (IPD) 荟萃分析。

依恋理论和研究中一个悬而未决的问题是儿童与父母的依恋模式在多大程度上共同预测发展结果。在这项研究中，我们使用个体参与者数据 (IPD) 荟萃分析来评估与母亲和父亲的早期依恋网络是否与儿童的内化和外化行为问题有关。按照预先注册的协议，分析中包括来自 9 项研究和 1,097 名儿童（平均年龄：28.67 个月）的数据，这些儿童具有对母亲和父亲的依恋分类。我们使用线性混合效应分析来评估儿童内化和外化行为问题的差异，这是通过基于孩子是否有两个、一个、或没有不安全（或杂乱无章）的依恋。结果表明，与父母双方安全依恋的儿童相比，与父母一方或双方的依恋关系不安全的儿童发生内化行为问题的风险更高。与父母双方的依恋关系被归类为杂乱无章的儿童与与父母有一种或没有杂乱依恋关系的儿童相比，有更多的外化行为问题。在依恋分类网络和行为问题中，研究结果表明：(a) 当孩子对父母双方的依恋不安全或杂乱无章时，行为问题的脆弱性增加；(b) 母子和父子依恋关系在角色上可能没有区别他们在孩子们玩耍

更新日期：2022-01-10

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊最新论文

全部期刊列表>>