当前位置: X-MOL 学术Alternative Law Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Richardson v Oracle more than half a decade on: Did the ‘ground break’ for victim compensation?
Alternative Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-26 , DOI: 10.1177/1037969x211052706
Joshua Taylor 1 , Alice Taylor 2
Affiliation  

In 2014, the decision in Richardson v Oracle significantly increased compensation awards for victims of discrimination and sexual harassment. Commentators referred to the decision as ‘ground-breaking’ and hypothesised that the floodgates would open for sexual harassment and discrimination cases. This article reviews these claims seven years on and asks: did the floodgates open? Case law review and analysis concludes that, while the ground did not break open for victims of discrimination and sexual harassment, it has certainly cracked – although unevenly. As such, more is required to create truly just outcomes for victims in discrimination law.



中文翻译:

理查森诉甲骨文五年多:受害者赔偿是否“破土动工”?

2014 年,理查森诉甲骨文案的裁决显着增加了对歧视和性骚扰受害者的赔偿金额。评论员称该决定是“开创性的”,并假设闸门将为性骚扰和歧视案件打开。这篇文章回顾了七年后的这些说法,并问道:闸门打开了吗?判例法审查和分析得出的结论是,虽然歧视和性骚扰的受害者没有破土动工,但它肯定已经破裂——尽管不均衡。因此,在歧视法中为受害者创造真正公正的结果需要更多的努力。

更新日期:2021-12-26
down
wechat
bug