当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Organizations Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Re-Evaluating Triage in International Justice during COVID-19 – Complying with the Rule of Law?
International Organizations Law Review Pub Date : 2021-12-20 , DOI: 10.1163/15723747-18030007
Francesca Ippolito 1
Affiliation  

This article addresses the challenges (and responses thereto) for those international institutions devoted to mandatory monitoring the individuals’ protection of fundamental rights during and after the COVID pandemic. It covers the practice of several of the main regional (European, Inter-American and African) judicial and quasi-judicial human rights bodies in a comparative overview with the UN human rights monitoring bodies and the International Criminal Court. The interesting medical metaphor of ‘triage’ (i.e., designing a system of priorities to maximize impact, during an emergency) is used to discuss the measures taken to preserve the rule of law, both in their internal functioning as well as in promoting the rule of law within national legal orders when monitoring the States’ compliance with international human rights obligations and guidelines about COVID-19. While overall, procedures in the different bodies were developed to ensure that the rule of law is maintained, which makes it easier to respond to similar crises in the future, the pandemic also sheds light on the need to revisit some substantive concepts in human rights law.



中文翻译:

在 COVID-19 期间重新评估国际司法中的分流 - 遵守法治?

本文针对那些致力于在 COVID 大流行期间和之后强制监测个人基本权利保护情况的国际机构所面临的挑战(及其应对措施)。它涵盖了几个主要区域(欧洲、美洲和非洲)司法和准司法人权机构的做法,并与联合国人权监督机构和国际刑事法院进行了比较概述。“分流”这个有趣的医学比喻(即在紧急情况下设计一个优先级系统以最大限度地发挥影响)用于讨论为维护法治而采取的措施,在监督各国遵守关于 COVID-19 的国际人权义务和指导方针的情况时,在其内部运作以及在国家法律秩序内促进法治。虽然总体而言,不同机构制定了程序以确保维持法治,这使得将来更容易应对类似危机,但大流行也表明需要重新审视人权法中的一些实质性概念.

更新日期:2021-12-21
down
wechat
bug