当前位置: X-MOL 学术Family Court Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Predictors of attendance at court-referred shuttle or videoconferencing mediation among separating or divorcing parents reporting high levels of intimate partner violence
Family Court Review Pub Date : 2021-12-19 , DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12577
Lily J. Jiang 1 , Fernanda S. Rossi 2 , Connie J. Beck 3 , Amy G. Applegate 4 , Jeannie M. Adams 5 , Amy Holtzworth‐Munroe 1
Affiliation  

A majority of separating parents seeking family mediation report intimate partner violence (IPV). Whether mediation is appropriate for such parties is controversial. Modified mediation approaches may enhance party safety by keeping them physically separated (e.g., shuttle and videoconferencing mediation). Unfortunately, little research exists regarding whether parties reporting IPV attend mediation, even proposed safer forms, and whether attendance is related to IPV reported, type of mediation provided, or parent gender. We examined IPV-related variables as predictors of court-referred mediation attendance among cases reporting high levels of IPV. Specifically, we compared cases that did or did not attend mediation. Cases were part of a larger randomized controlled trial that included shuttle and videoconferencing mediation conditions (Holtzworth-Munroe et al., 2020). No statistically significant findings emerged on several variables. However, parents reporting higher levels of IPV, even among this high IPV sample, were the most likely to not attend shuttle mediation. That finding held for both parents for level of reported injury but only for mothers for reported level of IPV victimization. While replication is required, efforts should continue to examine and develop dispute resolution interventions to provide safe, appropriate, and appealing services for parents reporting high levels of IPV, perhaps particularly for mothers.

中文翻译:

报告高水平亲密伴侣暴力的分居或离婚父母中出席法庭转介班车或视频会议调解的预测因素

大多数寻求家庭调解的分居父母报告了亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)。调解是否适合此类当事人存在争议。修改后的调解方法可以通过保持他们在物理上分开来增强当事人的安全(例如,穿梭和视频会议调解)。不幸的是,关于报告 IPV 的各方是否参加调解,甚至提出更安全的形式,以及出席是否与报告的 IPV、提供的调解类型或父母性别有关,几乎没有研究。我们在报告高水平 IPV 的案件中检查了 IPV 相关变量作为法院转介调解出席率的预测因素。具体来说,我们比较了参加或未参加调解的案件。案例是一项更大的随机对照试验的一部分,该试验包括穿梭和视频会议调解条件(Holtzworth-Munroe 等,2020)。在几个变量上没有出现统计学上显着的发现。然而,即使在这个高 IPV 样本中,报告更高水平的 IPV 的父母也最有可能不参加穿梭调解。这一发现适用于父母双方报告的伤害程度,但仅适用于母亲报告的 IPV 受害程度。虽然需要复制,但应继续努力检查和制定争端解决干预措施,为报告高水平 IPV 的父母提供安全、适当和有吸引力的服务,也许尤其是对母亲。报告较高水平的 IPV 的父母,即使在这个高 IPV 样本中,也最有可能不参加穿梭调解。这一发现适用于父母双方报告的伤害程度,但仅适用于母亲报告的 IPV 受害程度。虽然需要复制,但应继续努力检查和制定争端解决干预措施,为报告高水平 IPV 的父母提供安全、适当和有吸引力的服务,也许尤其是对母亲。报告较高水平的 IPV 的父母,即使在这个高 IPV 样本中,也最有可能不参加穿梭调解。这一发现适用于父母双方报告的伤害程度,但仅适用于母亲报告的 IPV 受害程度。虽然需要复制,但应继续努力检查和制定争端解决干预措施,为报告高水平 IPV 的父母提供安全、适当和有吸引力的服务,也许尤其是对母亲。
更新日期:2021-12-19
down
wechat
bug