当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Systematic Review of Effective Library Instruction for Business Students
Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship Pub Date : 2021-12-13 , DOI: 10.1080/08963568.2021.2015849
Céline Gareau-Brennan 1 , Janice Y. Kung 1
Affiliation  

Abstract

The most successful library teaching strategies for post-secondary business programs have yet to be determined. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of library instruction (with a focus on pedagogy) in business undergraduate and graduate programs. The researchers searched seven databases, selected studies that met the inclusion criteria, and extracted data following PRISMA guidelines. To achieve the study’s primary objective, the researchers included any library educational intervention in a business program conducted by librarians or library staff. The quality of included studies was evaluated based on a modified instrument designed to critically appraise educational interventions. The instrument consists of nine questions that relate to content, context, outcomes, study design, and methods. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and data was extracted based on subject area, content coverage, mode of instruction (in-person vs virtual), faculty collaboration, assessment strategies, and library educational interventions used to teach business students. Common educational interventions included hands-on activities, live demonstrations, active learning, group work, and lectures. The most compelling strategies include active learning, providing engaging sessions (e.g., flipped classroom), and faculty collaboration. Since most of the studies did not state clear learning outcomes, it is difficult to ascertain what type of interventions were truly effective in improving library sessions.



中文翻译:

对商科学生有效图书馆教学的系统评价

摘要

最成功的专上商务课程图书馆教学策略尚未确定。本系统评价的目的是调查商业本科和研究生课程中图书馆教学(以教学法为重点)的有效性。研究人员搜索了七个数据库,选择了符合纳入标准的研究,并按照 PRISMA 指南提取数据。为了实现这项研究的主要目标,研究人员将任何图书馆教育干预纳入图书馆员或图书馆工作人员开展的商业计划中。纳入研究的质量是根据旨在批判性评估教育干预的改进工具进行评估的。该工具由与内容、背景、结果、研究设计和方法相关的九个问题组成。35 项研究符合纳入标准,数据是根据学科领域、内容覆盖范围、教学模式(面对面与虚拟)、教师协作、评估策略和用于教授商科学生的图书馆教育干预措施提取的。常见的教育干预包括动手活动、现场演示、主动学习、小组工作和讲座。最引人注目的策略包括主动学习、提供引人入胜的课程(例如翻转课堂)和教师合作。由于大多数研究没有说明明确的学习成果,因此很难确定哪种干预措施在改善图书馆课程方面真正有效。用于教授商科学生的教师协作、评估策略和图书馆教育干预。常见的教育干预包括动手活动、现场演示、主动学习、小组工作和讲座。最引人注目的策略包括主动学习、提供引人入胜的课程(例如翻转课堂)和教师合作。由于大多数研究没有说明明确的学习成果,因此很难确定哪种干预措施在改善图书馆课程方面真正有效。用于教授商科学生的教师协作、评估策略和图书馆教育干预。常见的教育干预包括动手活动、现场演示、主动学习、小组工作和讲座。最引人注目的策略包括主动学习、提供引人入胜的课程(例如翻转课堂)和教师合作。由于大多数研究没有说明明确的学习成果,因此很难确定哪种干预措施在改善图书馆课程方面真正有效。提供引人入胜的课程(例如翻转课堂)和教师协作。由于大多数研究没有说明明确的学习成果,因此很难确定哪种干预措施在改善图书馆课程方面真正有效。提供引人入胜的课程(例如翻转课堂)和教师协作。由于大多数研究没有说明明确的学习成果,因此很难确定哪种干预措施在改善图书馆课程方面真正有效。

更新日期:2021-12-13
down
wechat
bug