当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Harv. Law Rev.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Blasphemy and the Original Meaning of the First Amendment
Harvard Law Review ( IF 6.032 ) Pub Date : 2021-12-10
Harvard Law Review ( IF 6.032 ) Pub Date : 2021-12-10
Until well into the twentieth century, American law recognized blasphemy as proscribable speech. The blackletter rule was clear. Constitutional liberty entailed a right to articulate views on religion, but not a right to commit blasphemy[footnote-short-crop]Compare Thomas M. Cooley,
中文翻译:
亵渎和第一修正案的本义
直到 20 世纪,美国法律才承认亵渎神灵是可禁止的言论。blackletter 规则是明确的。宪法自由意味着有权表达对宗教的看法,但不是亵渎的权利[footnote-short-crop]比较 Thomas M. Cooley,
更新日期:2021-12-10
中文翻译:
亵渎和第一修正案的本义
直到 20 世纪,美国法律才承认亵渎神灵是可禁止的言论。blackletter 规则是明确的。宪法自由意味着有权表达对宗教的看法,但不是亵渎的权利[footnote-short-crop]比较 Thomas M. Cooley,