The Adamakopoulos and Others v. Cyprus Decision is noteworthy because it provides a blueprint for mass claims proceedings in investment treaty arbitration, justifying the possibility of addressing investment claims en masse in the future. This case comment reviews the background to the dispute, addresses the majority decision on the mass claims, and comments on the Tribunal's reasoning regarding the non-requirement of additional consent to mass claims arbitration, the homogeneity of the claims, and procedural flexibility.

中文翻译：

---

Adamakopoulos 和其他人诉塞浦路斯：关于在投资条约仲裁中进行的大规模索赔的“巨大”问题？

这Adamakopoulos 等人诉塞浦路斯裁决值得注意，因为它为投资条约仲裁中的大规模索赔程序提供了蓝图，证明了解决投资索赔的可能性集体将来。本案例评论回顾了争议的背景，解决了关于集体索赔的多数决定，并评论了仲裁庭关于不需要额外同意集体索赔仲裁、索赔的同质性和程序灵活性的推理。