Species reintroductions are growing in popularity, and example motivations include supporting species populations or the restoration of ecosystem function. Interactions between humans and the reintroduced species are likely to occur post-reintroduction. Coexistence between humans and wildlife is adaptive and dynamic, in part requiring management of conflicts between humans and wildlife, or of conflicts between humans over wildlife management. We seek to learn from the experiences of steering group members in a Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) project in England and identify how governance of coexistence with reintroduced species may differ from the governance of coexistence with species that are already present in the landscape. Using a qualitative thematic analysis of an online survey, we identify a series of lessons in six key areas: (1) project governance, (2) stakeholder engagement, (3) research and monitoring programme, (4) strategy to manage arising conflicts, (5) public engagement, and (6) broad perspectives on reintroduction trials. We advocate for reflective evaluation as an essential component of reintroduction projects to enable knowledge-sharing from experiences, leading to improved practices in the future. Reflecting on our analysis, we identify and define ‘Renewed Coexistence’—a new term that draws on pre-existing coexistence knowledge but identifies the unique elements that relate to governing coexistence with reintroduced species.

物种重新引入越来越受欢迎，示例动机包括支持物种种群或恢复生态系统功能。人类与重新引入的物种之间的相互作用很可能在重新引入后发生。人类与野生动物之间的共存具有适应性和动态性，部分需要管理人类与野生动物之间的冲突，或人类之间在野生动物管理方面的冲突。我们寻求从欧亚海狸（蓖麻纤维）中指导小组成员的经验中学习) 项目，并确定与重新引入物种共存的治理可能与与景观中已经存在的物种共存的治理有何不同。使用在线调查的定性主题分析，我们确定了六个关键领域的一系列经验教训：（1）项目治理，（2）利益相关者参与，（3）研究和监测计划，（4）管理出现冲突的策略， (5) 公众参与，以及 (6) 对放归试验的广泛看法。我们提倡将反思性评估作为重新引入项目的重要组成部分，以实现从经验中分享知识，从而在未来改进实践。回顾我们的分析，