Should clinical automated perimetry be considered for routine functional assessment of early/intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD)? A systematic review of current literature,Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Should clinical automated perimetry be considered for routine functional assessment of early/intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD)? A systematic review of current literature
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-11-29 , DOI: 10.1111/opo.12919
Matt Trinh _{1,

2} , Michael Kalloniatis _{1,

2} , Lisa Nivison-Smith _{1,

2}

Affiliation

There is growing interest in functional testing for early/intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). However, systematic evaluation of existing clinical functional tests is lacking. This systematic review examines evidence for using clinical automated perimetry in routine assessment of early/iAMD.

中文翻译：

临床自动视野检查是否应考虑用于早期/中期年龄相关性黄斑变性 (AMD) 的常规功能评估？对当前文献的系统评价

人们对早期/中期年龄相关性黄斑变性 (iAMD) 的功能测试越来越感兴趣。然而，缺乏对现有临床功能测试的系统评估。本系统评价检查了在早期/iAMD 的常规评估中使用临床自动视野测量的证据。

更新日期：2021-12-06

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊最新论文

全部期刊列表>>