In the Original Investigation titled “Effectiveness and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats in Adults With Depression: A Network Meta-analysis,” published in the July 2019 issue, there was a numeric and content error in the Results section. The sentence given as “Guided self-help format ranked considerably lower than the other treatment formats (1.6%; RR=0.72)” should have presented the relative risk as 1.39, followed by the phrase “increasing dropouts in comparison with care as usual.” In addition, the label of Figure 3B given as “Acceptability” should have been “Dropouts from study (acceptability).” The values for the forest plot of Figure 3B presented dropouts of care as usual over each of the treatment formats but should have presented dropouts of the various formats over care as usual. A Letter of Explanation has been published that explains the errors. This article has been corrected. This article was previously corrected on July 17, 2019, to fix a label error in Figure 3B.

中文翻译：

---

结果和图 3B 标签和绘图值中的错误

在 2019 年 7 月刊上发表的题为“抑郁症成人认知行为疗法提供形式的有效性和可接受性：网络荟萃分析”的原始调查中，结果部分存在数字和内容错误。给出的句子“引导式自助形式的排名远低于其他治疗形式（1.6%；RR=0.72）”应该将相对风险表示为 1.39，然后是“与照常护理相比增加辍学率”。 ” 此外，图 3B 中作为“可接受性”的标签应该是“辍学（可接受性）”。图 3B 的森林图的值显示了每种治疗形式的照常护理辍学，但应该呈现各种形式的辍学而不是照常照护。一封解释信已发布，解释了这些错误。本文已被纠正。本文之前已于 2019 年 7 月 17 日更正，以修复图 3B 中的标签错误。