当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Processes and determining factors when family court judgments are made in England about infants entering care at birth
Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law Pub Date : 2021-11-23 , DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2021.1996082
June Thoburn 1, 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on the England part of a research project exploring judicial decision making in eight jurisdictions with respect to care applications in respect of new-born infants. Descriptive data are provided on a total cohort of 278 care applications made to three English family court care centres in 2016. Attention is paid to final orders made and findings are reported on differences between the three care centres with respect to the proportions of orders made (mainly placement orders; but also care orders and Special Guardianship Orders). A particular focus of the paper is on the ‘transparency’ of court processes as evidenced by the availability of transcripts of judgements. To add to the small proportion of cases (11%) where a transcript was available, 30 English judgements on new-borns reported to the BAILII data base in 2016 were also analysed. Differences were found between proportions of orders made when a judgement transcript was or was not available. It is argued that these results add to the call for greater transparency in the family courts.



中文翻译:

英格兰家庭法院就婴儿出生时进入护理作出判决时的程序和决定因素

摘要

本文报道了一个研究项目的英格兰部分,该项目探讨了八个司法管辖区关于新生儿护理申请的司法决策。提供了 2016 年向三个英国家庭法院护理中心提出的总共 278 份护理申请的描述性数据。注意最终命令,并报告三个护理中心之间在命令比例方面的差异(主要是安置令;还有照顾令和特别监护令)。该论文的一个特别关注点是法院程序的“透明度”,这可以从判决记录的可用性得到证明。为了增加可提供成绩单的小部分案例(11%),还分析了 2016 年向 BAILII 数据库报告的 30 条新生儿英语判断。当判决记录可用或不可用时,发现命令的比例存在差异。有人认为,这些结果增加了对提高家庭法庭透明度的呼吁。

更新日期:2021-11-23
down
wechat
bug