This article reports the results of an ethics survey of professional members of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP/APA-Div. 14) conducted in 2019, and compares its findings with those of a similar survey conducted in 2009. In 2019, but not 2009, international members and associates were included. A total of 680 survey responses were received in 2019, with 157 of them describing a narrative incident of a recently experienced ethical situation. In 2009, 228 of 661 respondents described a total of 292 incidents. Respondents were asked to categorize and rate their incidents on a variety of attributes. Demographic subgroup analyses showed more similarities than differences in the nature and outcomes of ethical issues reported. However, differences were observed as a function of work domain (academe, internal practice, external practice), membership status (member/fellow/associate), career stage (years since highest degree), and field of highest degree (I-O psychology, other psychology area, and business), suggesting caution if generalizing to the entire field. Respondents who actually faced the ethical issue described viewed it as somewhat less serious than those who occupied some other (observer) role in the situation, and also reported more successful resolutions. Comparing 2019 with 2009 data revealed overall consistency in the relative incidence of different forms of ethical challenges and the work activity areas in which they arise. However, in 2019 there were more covert incidents (e.g., role conflicts, values conflicts, conflicts of interest) and fewer overt incidents (e.g., coercion, corruption). Implications for improving ethics education and training are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

工业组织心理学家报告的道德事件：十年随访。

本文报告了 2019 年对工业和组织心理学协会 (SIOP/APA-Div. 14) 专业成员进行的道德调查结果，并将其结果与 2009 年进行的类似调查的结果进行了比较。2019 年，但不是 2009 年，包括国际会员和同事。2019 年共收到 680 份调查回复，其中 157 份描述了最近经历的道德状况的叙述性事件。2009 年，661 名受访者中有 228 人描述了总共 292 起事件。受访者被要求根据各种属性对他们的事件进行分类和评分。人口统计亚组分析显示，所报告的伦理问题的性质和结果的相似性多于差异。然而，观察到的差异是工作领域（学术界、内部实践、外部实践）、会员身份（会员/研究员/助理）、职业阶段（自最高学位以来的年数）和最高学位领域（IO 心理学、其他心理学领域和商业），如果推广到整个领域，建议谨慎。实际面临所描述的道德问题的受访者认为它比那些在这种情况下担任其他（观察者）角色的人稍微不那么严重，并且还报告了更成功的解决方案。将 2019 年与 2009 年的数据进行比较，揭示了不同形式道德挑战的相对发生率及其出现的工作活动领域的总体一致性。然而，在 2019 年，隐性事件（例如，角色冲突、价值观冲突、利益冲突）更多，而公开事件（例如，胁迫、腐败）则更少。讨论了改进道德教育和培训的意义。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA，保留所有权利）。