ABSTRACT

I discuss the idea that the objects of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus are propertyless bare particulars, an idea defended by Leonard Goddard and Brenda Judge in their monograph, The Metaphysics of the Tractatus. I present the difficulties that Goddard and Judge raise for this construal concerning the idea that Tractarian objects have natures that determine their possibilities of combination, and I assess the solution they propose. I offer an alternative construal of the notion with which these difficulties can be overcome.

中文翻译：

---

戈达德和法官对 Tractarian 对象

摘要

我讨论了维特根斯坦的《逻辑哲学论》的对象是无财产的裸露细节的观点，伦纳德·戈达德 (Leonard Goddard) 和布伦达·贾奇 (Brenda Judge) 在他们的专着《逻辑学的形而上学》中捍卫了这一观点。我介绍了 Goddard 和 Judge 为这种解释提出的困难，即 Tractarian 对象具有决定其组合可能性的性质，我评估了他们提出的解决方案。我提供了可以克服这些困难的概念的另一种解释。