Universal jurisdiction (UJ), which not very long ago seemed condemned to extinction, is now becoming routine. It has been endorsed by 109 states, and the number of prosecutions is increasing. This article is based on an ethnographic study of the recent trial in France of Pascal Simbikangwa, a Rwandan accused of participating in the genocide against the Tutsi in 1994. Using the concepts of ‘vernacularization’ and ‘transnational legal orders’, it shows how UJ is creating a transnational judicial space (TJS). Involving both partisan and ordinary actors, this process is fraught with multiple conflicts. Although UJ does not participate in the dissemination of a uniform definition of genocide, it makes various jurisdictions work together. This fragmented transnational justice is paradoxically contributing to the integration of national legal systems.

中文翻译：

---

多个司法管辖区的故事：普遍管辖权如何创造跨国司法空间

不久前似乎注定要灭绝的普遍管辖权（UJ）现在正成为常规。它已得到 109 个州的认可，并且起诉的数量正在增加。本文基于对最近在法国审判帕斯卡尔·辛比康瓦（Pascal Simbikangwa）的民族志研究，他是一名卢旺达人，被指控参与了 1994 年针对图西族的种族灭绝。使用“本土化”和“跨国法律秩序”的概念，它展示了 UJ 如何正在创建一个跨国司法空间（TJS）。这个过程涉及党派和普通演员，充满了多重冲突。尽管 UJ 不参与传播种族灭绝的统一定义，但它使各个司法管辖区共同工作。这种支离破碎的跨国司法自相矛盾地促进了国家法律体系的整合。