As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, our societies went into a lockdown model and many organizations required or permitted their employees to work from home. As a result, employees need to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic while they work from home, providing an opportunity to examine how COVID-19 prevention experiences influence those who are working from home. Based on the interpersonal self-regulation perspective, we propose that employees who perceive having more disagreements with their partners over COVID-19 prevention measures are more likely to experience a reduction in their identification with the partner which is subsequently associated with their negative work outcomes through emotional exhaustion. Results from a two-wave survey study with a sample of 282 employees who worked from home during the COVID-19 pandemic supported our predictions: perceived self-partner disagreements over COVID-19 prevention measures related to a reduction in identification with the partner, which was subsequently associated with exhausted regulatory resources and undermined work outcomes. Furthermore, these negative effects were particularly salient for individuals who were not married. Theoretical and practical implications for family-to-work interference and working from home in times of crisis are discussed.

作为对 COVID-19 大流行的回应，我们的社会进入了封锁模式，许多组织要求或允许其员工在家工作。因此，员工在家工作时需要应对 COVID-19 大流行，这提供了一个机会来检查 COVID-19 预防经验如何影响在家工作的人。基于人际关系自我调节的观点，我们建议认为与合作伙伴在 COVID-19 预防措施上存在更多分歧的员工更有可能降低对合作伙伴的认同，这随后与他们的负面工作结果相关：情绪疲惫。以 282 名在 COVID-19 大流行期间在家工作的员工为样本的两波调查研究的结果支持了我们的预测：认为自我伴侣对 COVID-19 预防措施的分歧与减少与伴侣的认同有关，这随后与耗尽的监管资源和破坏的工作成果相关联。此外，这些负面影响对于未婚人士尤为显着。讨论了危机时期家庭对工作的干扰和在家工作的理论和实践意义。这些负面影响对于未婚人士尤为明显。讨论了危机时期家庭对工作的干扰和在家工作的理论和实践意义。这些负面影响对于未婚人士尤为明显。讨论了危机时期家庭对工作的干扰和在家工作的理论和实践意义。