Since the adoption of the first United Nations Security Council (UNSC) counterterrorism resolution after the 9/11 attacks, the UNSC has increasingly required the domestic criminalization of “terrorism” acts and ancillary activities. Without the inclusion of an explicit international humanitarian law (IHL) or humanitarian exception, the UNSC has – so far – failed to harmonize the counterterrorism legal framework with IHL, leaving it up to States to define the interaction between the two. In their national legislation and courts, States’ interpretations have varied but counterterrorism legislations have been used to adjudicate conducts in armed conflicts, regardless of their legality under IHL. As the domestication of UNSC offences is ongoing, good practices are highlighted in this paper and recommendations are offered to ensure the development of international customary law in accordance with IHL.

中文翻译：

---

国际人道法和对恐怖主义的刑事司法回应：从联合国安理会到国家法院

自 9/11 袭击后通过第一个联合国安理会 (UNSC) 反恐决议以来，联合国安理会越来越多地要求在国内将“恐怖主义”行为和辅助活动定为刑事犯罪。在没有纳入明确的国际人道法 (IHL) 或人道例外情况的情况下，联合国安理会迄今未能将反恐法律框架与国际人道法相协调，由各国来定义两者之间的相互作用。在其国家立法和法院中，各国的解释各不相同，但反恐立法已被用于裁决武装冲突中的行为，无论其在国际人道法下的合法性如何。随着对 UNSC 罪行的驯化工作正在进行中，