Evidence published nearly 20 years ago suggested people tell more lies per social interaction via synchronous, distributed, and recordless media (the phone) versus relatively richer (face-to-face communication) and leaner media (email, instant messaging). With nontrivial changes to the size and variety of our media landscape, it is worth re-examining the relationship between deception and technology. Over 7 days, 250 participants reported their social interactions and lies across face-to-face communication, social media, texting, the phone, video chat, and email. Replicating Hancock, Thom-Santelli, and Ritchie (2004), people told the most lies per social interaction over synchronous, distributed, and recordless media (the phone, video chat), though the effects were small and between-person effects explained more variance than between-media effects. Lying rates were also associated with aversive personality traits, plus antisocial, and relational deception motives. Together, while media options have evolved, technological design features often remain stable and indicate deception rates. Theoretical contributions are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

重新审视欺骗与设计之间的关系：汉考克等人的复制和扩展。(2004)

近 20 年前公布的证据表明，人们通过同步、分布式和无记录的媒体（电话）在每次社交互动中撒谎，而不是相对更丰富（面对面交流）和更精简的媒体（电子邮件、即时消息）。随着我们媒体格局的规模和多样性发生了重大变化，值得重新审视欺骗与技术之间的关系。在 7 天的时间里，250 名参与者报告了他们的社交互动，并在面对面交流、社交媒体、短信、电话、视频聊天和电子邮件中撒谎。复制 Hancock、Thom-Santelli 和 Ritchie (2004)，人们在同步、分布式和无记录媒体（电话、视频聊天）上的每次社交互动中撒谎最多，尽管影响很小，人与人之间的影响解释了更多的差异而不是媒体之间的效果。说谎率也与厌恶的人格特征、反社会和关系欺骗动机有关。总之，虽然媒体选项已经发展，但技术设计特征通常保持稳定并表明欺骗率。讨论了理论贡献。