当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. J. Law Econ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Disagreeing in private or dissenting in public: an empirical exploration of possible motivations
European Journal of Law and Economics ( IF 1.266 ) Pub Date : 2021-11-06 , DOI: 10.1007/s10657-021-09713-6
Nuno Garoupa 1 , Laura Salamero-Teixidó 2 , Adrián Segura 3
Affiliation  

There are different theories to explain judicial dissent in collegial courts or committees. In the Spanish Council of State (Consejo de Estado), councilors can disagree with the majority opinion without filing an individual separate opinion. Drawing on a newly assembled dataset of all nonunanimous decisions for the period 2002–2018, we explore possible determinants to explain the individual decision to file a separate opinion when there is already explicit disagreement. We find that professional background and demographics seem to be the most powerful explanatory variables rather than characteristics of the case.



中文翻译:

私下不同意或公开不同意:对可能动机的实证探索

在合议庭或委员会中,有不同的理论来解释司法异议。在西班牙国务委员会 ( Consejo de Estado ) 中,议员可以不同意多数意见而无需提交个别意见。利用 2002 年至 2018 年期间所有非一致决定的新组合数据集,我们探索了可能的决定因素,以解释在已经存在明确分歧时提交单独意见的个人决定。我们发现专业背景和人口统计学似乎是最有力的解释变量,而不是案例的特征。

更新日期:2021-11-07
down
wechat
bug