This case note examines how the Supreme Court approached the complex problem of overlapping legal proceedings involving asylum claims and child abduction. It analyses the purposive approach taken by the Supreme Court in G v G to the determination of how a child, who has not independently claimed asylum, should be understood to have done so, and the ramifications of this for the child's legal status in any claim for their return under the Hague Convention on Child Abduction. It further seeks to address the novel approach by which the Supreme Court dealt with this problem. By formulating draft standard directions for the handling of such cases, the Court brought into focus questions about the limits of the judicial function of promoting good governance.

中文翻译：

---

当我们的道路再次交叉时：最高法院在 G 诉 G 案中对相关庇护和儿童诱拐索赔的管理

本案例说明审查了最高法院如何处理涉及庇护申请和绑架儿童的法律程序重叠的复杂问题。它分析了最高法院在G v G案中采取的有目的的方法来确定一个没有独立申请庇护的儿童应该如何被理解为已经这样做，以及这对儿童在任何申请中的法律地位的影响根据《关于诱拐儿童的海牙公约》将他们遣返。它进一步寻求解决最高法院处理这一问题的新方法。通过制定处理此类案件的标准方向草案，法院重点关注促进善治的司法职能的局限性问题。