While a Constitution embodies the basic principles and laws of a nation, its language and text may introduce ambiguity or confusion, especially during implementation of its laws. In such situations, interpretation of the text becomes more important than the text itself. The Federal UAE Constitution was issued in 1971 and includes a provision to specify the authority competent to interpret its contents. However, if the constitutional text that cited the interpretation jurisdiction of the Court is brief, then this research only gains important reason to explore the ambiguities of these texts and work. Therefore, this study aims to review and analyze Court rulings according to interpretation requests submitted to it from its inception to date. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to attempt to undertake the Court’s interpretative experience into a constructive legal analysis and highlight this genuine constitutional competence, which lacks a detailed discussion.

虽然宪法体现了一个国家的基本原则和法律，但其语言和文本可能会带来歧义或混乱，尤其是在其法律的实施过程中。在这种情况下，对文本的解释变得比文本本身更重要。阿联酋联邦宪法于 1971 年颁布，其中包括一项规定，规定有权解释其内容的机构。然而，如果引用法院解释管辖权的宪法文本是简短的，那么本研究只能获得重要的理由来探讨这些文本和工作的歧义。因此，本研究旨在根据从一开始到现在提交给它的解释请求来审查和分析法院裁决。据我们所知，我们的研究首次尝试将法院的解释经验转化为建设性的法律分析，并突出这种缺乏详细讨论的真正宪法权限。