当前位置: X-MOL 学术Family Court Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Practicing Best Practice: A 10-Year Retrospective on Universal Risk Screening in a Mediation and Counseling Organization
Family Court Review Pub Date : 2021-10-18 , DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12603
Jamie Lee , Claire Ralfs 1 , Anna Booth , Jennifer E. McIntosh
Affiliation  

Separation is a high-risk time in families and for many it marks the onset or escalation of family safety and wellbeing risks like Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). Best practice for identifying such risks in court or community mediation services is systematic inquiry about safety risks with structured tools to overcome under-reporting of risks. However, turning best practice recommendations into routine practice can take years – even when the evidence is strong that practitioners and their clients will ultimately benefit. Relationships Australia South Australia has addressed this evidence-practice gap by engaging our leadership and undertaking whole-of-organization implementation of the Family DOORS framework. This includes the validated screening tool DOOR 1, that helps practitioners identify and respond to family-wide risks during peak stress such as separation. In this article, we review our 10-year implementation journey towards best practice in risk screening, reporting on 28,097 screens completed with clients to date. We describe the initiatives used to address practitioner and infrastructure barriers to implementation. We present both quantitative and qualitative indicators of practitioner change along with client survey data (n = 1,291), demonstrating changes in practices that have enhanced client engagement and led to an increase in client safety and wellbeing outcomes. We share recommendations for and innovations in translation to other service contexts. We hope that using the following recommendations and adopting the DOORS tools will encourage and enable others to implement best practice risk screening in far less than 10 years.

中文翻译:

实践最佳实践:调解和咨询组织普遍风险筛查 10 年回顾

分离是家庭中的高风险时期,对许多人来说,它标志着家庭安全和幸福风险的开始或升级,例如亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV)。在法庭或社区调解服务中识别此类风险的最佳做法是使用结构化工具系统地询问安全风险,以克服风险报告不足的问题。然而,将最佳实践建议转化为常规实践可能需要数年时间——即使有充分的证据表明从业者及其客户最终会受益。南澳大利亚州关系部通过让我们的领导参与进来并在整个组织内实施 Family DOORS 框架,解决了这一证据与实践的差距。这包括经过验证的筛选工具 DOOR 1,这有助于从业者在压力高峰期(例如分离)识别和应对家庭范围内的风险。在本文中,我们回顾了我们实现风险筛查最佳实践的 10 年实施历程,报告了迄今为止与客户完成的 28,097 次筛查。我们描述了用于解决从业者和基础设施实施障碍的举措。我们提供了从业者变化的定量和定性指标以及客户调查数据(n  = 1,291),展示了增强客户参与度并导致客户安全和福祉结果增加的实践变化。我们分享翻译到其他服务环境的建议和创新。我们希望使用以下建议并采用 DOORS 工具将鼓励并帮助其他人在不到 10 年的时间内实施最佳实践风险筛查。
更新日期:2021-10-19
down
wechat
bug