The current study used a person-oriented approach to investigate (a) potential distinctive groups of women survivors of IPV based on their posttraumatic growth (PTG), centrality of event, resilience, and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) patterns, and (b) examine the role of sociodemographic (age, education, work status) and violence related (physical and emotional violence, time since last violence episode, psychological help) factors in distinguishing these groups. The study sample consisted of 421 women survivors of IPV, and latent profile analysis revealed four profiles: “negative impact” (11% of the sample), “positive growth” (46%), “low impact” (18%), and “distressed growth” (25%). Women age, education, received psychological help, frequency of physical and emotional violence, and time since last violence incident significantly distinguished some of the indicated profiles from each other. Findings of this study contribute to the existing literature by identifying different responses to IPV and investigating some of the theoretical assumptions that had not been comprehensively analyzed in the IPV literature. Limitations of the study and implications for future research are discussed.

目前的研究使用以人为本的方法来调查 (a) IPV 女性幸存者的潜在独特群体，基于她们的创伤后成长 (PTG)、事件的中心性、恢复力和创伤后应激症状 (PTSS) 模式，以及 (b)检查社会人口统计学（年龄、教育、工作状况）和暴力相关（身体和情感暴力、自上次暴力事件以来的时间、心理帮助）因素在区分这些群体中的作用。研究样本由 421 名 IPV 女性幸存者组成，潜在概况分析揭示了四种概况：“负面影响”（样本的 11%）、“正增长”（46%）、“低影响”（18%）和“不良增长”（25%）。女性年龄、教育程度、接受心理帮助、身体和情感暴力的频率、和自上次暴力事件以来的时间显着区分了一些指定的配置文件。本研究的结果通过确定对 IPV 的不同反应和调查 IPV 文献中尚未全面分析的一些理论假设，为现有文献做出了贡献。讨论了研究的局限性和对未来研究的影响。