当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Nat. Hum. Behav.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
You have to read this
Nature Human Behaviour ( IF 29.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-11 , DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01221-6 Paula L Croxson 1, 2, 3 , Liz Neeley 4 , Daniela Schiller 3, 5
Nature Human Behaviour ( IF 29.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-11 , DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01221-6 Paula L Croxson 1, 2, 3 , Liz Neeley 4 , Daniela Schiller 3, 5
Affiliation
Reading scientific papers is a necessary part of the research enterprise, but poor writing impedes the flow of information from authors to their audiences. We argue that a return to narrative in scientific writing is not incompatible with rigour and objectivity; it can mitigate information overload and achieve the core purpose of publication: to communicate.
中文翻译:
你必须阅读这个
阅读科学论文是研究事业的必要组成部分,但糟糕的写作会阻碍信息从作者到读者的流动。我们认为,在科学写作中回归叙事与严谨和客观并不矛盾。它可以减轻信息过载并达到发布的核心目的:交流。
更新日期:2021-10-12
中文翻译:
你必须阅读这个
阅读科学论文是研究事业的必要组成部分,但糟糕的写作会阻碍信息从作者到读者的流动。我们认为,在科学写作中回归叙事与严谨和客观并不矛盾。它可以减轻信息过载并达到发布的核心目的:交流。