当前位置: X-MOL 学术Remote Sens. Environ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Daily estimation of gross primary production under all sky using a light use efficiency model coupled with satellite passive microwave measurements
Remote Sensing of Environment ( IF 13.5 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-08 , DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112721
Yipu Wang 1 , Rui Li 1, 2, 3 , Jiheng Hu 1 , Yuyun Fu 1, 3 , Jiawei Duan 1 , Yuanxi Cheng 1
Affiliation  

Although satellite-based light use efficiency (LUE) model is widely used to estimate gross primary production (GPP) of terrestrial ecosystems, microwave observations have not been integrated into LUE models. This study developed a new LUE model coupled with a passive microwave vegetation index (Emissivity Difference Vegetation Index, EDVI) for daily GPP estimation. Normalized EDVI (nEDVI), an indicator of canopy-scale leaf development and biomass change, was used as a proxy of fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR). EDVI-based evaporative fraction (EDVI-EF) under all sky was used to indicate synoptic-scale water stress on LUE. 8-year in-situ measurements from seven flux tower sites (four forests, two grasslands and one croplands) of ChinaFLUX network were used to evaluate the model. We found that nEDVI-based FPAR better captured the short-term variations in daily in-situ GPP (GPPobs) than other optic-based FPAR schemes. This capability of nEDVI was more noticeable under moderate and heavy cloud cover (Frc) conditions. Validations against daily GPPobs at all sites showed that EDVI-based GPP (GPPEDVI) generated an overall small bias of −0.47 gC m−2 day−1 (−8.1%) and good Taylor score (S) of 0.86 at the daily scale. Better accuracy of GPPEDVI was found at forests sites with R2 of 0.43 to 0.73, bias of-5.29% to 3.03% and S of 0.58 to 0.78, respectively. At a tropical forest site with most frequent cloud cover, the model also well captured the variation in GPPobs from clear sky to cloudy sky (R2 of 0.93) with stable accuracies. Furthermore, the accuracy of daily GPPEDVI was found to be comparable with global satellite optic MOD17 GPP (GPPMOD17) and EC-LUE GPP (GPPECLUE) from 8-day to yearly scales across the sites. In particular, GPPEDVI performed generally smaller bias at evergreen broadleaf forests, while both of GPPMOD17 and GPPECLUE were overestimated, suggesting that there could be less saturation for microwave-based LUE model over dense vegetation. Although all three satellite LUE models severely underestimated GPP of crop, GPPEDVI generated lower bias (−29.8%) than GPPMOD17 (−66.8%) and GPPECLUE (−59.5%). Overall, this study is the first attempt toward the integration of microwave-derived variables into LUE model for daily GPP estimation. The microwave-based LUE model has a potential of mapping spatiotemporally continues daily GPP under various clouds.



中文翻译:

使用光利用效率模型与卫星无源微波测量相结合,每日估算所有天空下的初级生产总值

尽管基于卫星的光利用效率 (LUE) 模型被广泛用于估算陆地生态系统的初级生产总值 (GPP),但微波观测尚未被整合到 LUE 模型中。本研究开发了一种新的 LUE 模型,结合被动微波植被指数(发射率差异植被指数,EDVI),用于每日 GPP 估计。归一化 EDVI (nEDVI) 是冠层叶片发育和生物量变化的指标,被用作光合有效辐射 (FPAR) 分数的代表。全天空下基于 EDVI 的蒸发率 (EDVI-EF) 用于指示 LUE 的天气尺度水分胁迫。使用来自 ChinaFLUX 网络的 7 个通量塔站点(4 个森林、2 个草地和 1 个农田)的 8 年原位测量来评估该模型。obs ) 比其他基于光学的 FPAR 方案。在中度和重度云量 (Frc) 条件下,nEDVI 的这种能力更为明显。对所有站点的每日 GPP观察的验证表明,基于 EDVI 的 GPP (GPP EDVI ) 产生了 -0.47 gC m -2 天-1 (-8.1%)的总体小偏差和每天 0.86 的良好泰勒评分 (S)规模。在 R 2为 0.43 至 0.73、偏差为-5.29% 至 3.03% 和 S 分别为 0.58 至 0.78 的森林地点发现GPP EDVI 的准确度更高。在云量最频繁的热带森林地点,该模型还很好地捕捉了从晴空到多云天空的GPP观测值的变化(R 20.93) 具有稳定的精度。此外,发现每日 GPP EDVI的准确性与全球卫星光学 MOD17 GPP (GPP MOD17 ) 和 EC-LUE GPP (GPP ECLUE ) 从 8 天到跨站点的年度尺度相当。特别是,GPP EDVI在常绿阔叶林中的偏差普遍较小,而 GPP MOD17和 GPP ECLUE均被高估,表明基于微波的 LUE 模型在茂密植被上的饱和度可能较低。尽管所有三个卫星 LUE 模型都严重低估了作物的 GPP,但 GPP EDVI产生的偏差 (-29.8%) 低于 GPP MOD17 (-66.8%) 和 GPP ECLUE(-59.5%)。总的来说,这项研究是首次尝试将微波衍生变量整合到 LUE 模型中以进行日常 GPP 估计。基于微波的 LUE 模型具有在各种云下绘制时空连续每日 GPP 的潜力。

更新日期:2021-10-08
down
wechat
bug