ABSTRACT

The integrative framework proposed by Luck and colleagues [Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949] represents major progress in the field of attention research, and remaining areas of disagreement provide an opportunity to test hypotheses by drawing on other research traditions. From the perspective of research in cognitive-affective neuroscience, we first suggest ways in which recent analytic innovations in human neuroimaging can be used to test hypotheses proposed by Folk and Remington about how biases within distinct brain systems may be integrated within a control state. We then shift focus and extend recent critiques of the generalizability of vision-centred frameworks of emotional guidance of attention to the integrative framework, citing evidence that vision-based frameworks of attentional capture do not necessarily extend to other sensory modalities.

摘要

Luck 及其同事提出的综合框架 [Luck, SJ, Gaspelin, N., Folk, CL, Remington, RW, & Theeuwes, J. (2021)。解决注意力捕获争论的进展。视觉认知, 29(1), 1–21。https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949] 代表了注意力研究领域的重大进展，其余的分歧领域提供了通过借鉴其他研究传统来检验假设的机会。从认知情感神经科学研究的角度来看，我们首先提出了一些方法，其中人类神经影像学的最新分析创新可用于测试 Folk 和 Remington 提出的关于不同大脑系统内的偏见如何整合到控制状态中的假设。然后，我们将焦点转移并将最近对以视觉为中心的注意力的情感引导框架的普遍性的批评扩展到综合框架，并引用了基于视觉的注意力捕获框架不一定扩展到其他感官方式的证据。