Despite being conceived as a framework to protect civil and political rights in peacetime, the European Convention on Human Rights is currently being applied in states affected by armed conflicts with challenging socio-economic demands. This article outlines the European Court of Human Rights’ current approach for the protection of human rights in conflict-related scenarios and critically examines its suitability to cope with the socio-economic challenges that arise in post-conflict settings. With recourse to legal theory and moral thought, it explores an alternative avenue to coherently frame the Court’s practice to overcome certain problematic distributive outcomes that derive from the prevailing approach. The suggested alternative is a regime of positive duties intended to ensure an adequate standard of living after widespread violence.

中文翻译：

---

赔偿：目的是什么？通过欧洲人权法院制定国家在冲突后环境中解决社会经济危害的积极责任

尽管被认为是和平时期保护公民权利和政治权利的框架，但《欧洲人权公约》目前正适用于受武装冲突影响且社会经济需求具有挑战性的国家。本文概述了欧洲人权法院当前在冲突相关情况下保护人权的方法，并批判性地检验了其是否适合应对冲突后环境中出现的社会经济挑战。通过诉诸法律理论和道德思想，它探索了一种替代途径，以连贯地构建法院的实践，以克服源自流行方法的某些有问题的分配结果。建议的替代方案是一种积极义务制度，旨在确保广泛的暴力事件发生后的适足生活水平。