当前位置: X-MOL 学术Discourse Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
B-event statements as vehicles for two interactional practices in police interactions with suspects/witnesses
Discourse Studies ( IF 1.871 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-23 , DOI: 10.1177/14614456211037449
Marijana Cerović 1
Affiliation  

B-events are matters which are better known to listeners than to speakers. This paper studies the detectives’ use of B-event statements in two different environments in their interactions with suspects/witnesses. The first type of environment are relatively co-operative sequences during which the aim is the reconstruction of events and constructing the record; here, B-event statements are realised as confirmation seeking questions. The second type of environment, a hostile interactional environment, is composed of argumentative sequences in which detectives aim to determine who are the perpetrators of crimes; in these sequences, the detectives’ B-event statements are realised as accusations. While performing the two activities, the detectives signal different epistemic levels and stances at the turn level. Thus, the former B-event statements are mostly epistemically downgraded, while the latter are mostly upgraded, in order to facilitate undertaking these different activities during police questioning.



中文翻译:

B 事件陈述作为警方与嫌疑人/证人互动中两种互动实践的载体

B-事件是听众比演讲者更了解的事情。本文研究了侦探在两种不同环境中与嫌疑人/证人互动时使用 B 事件陈述的情况。第一类环境是相对合作的序列,其目的是重建事件和构建记录;在这里,B 事件语句被实现为寻求确认的问题。第二种环境,敌对的互动环境,由辩论序列组成,侦探旨在确定谁是犯罪者;在这些序列中,侦探的 B 事件陈述被实现为指控。在执行这两项活动时,侦探在回合级别发出不同的认知水平和立场信号。因此,

更新日期:2021-09-23
down
wechat
bug