当前位置: X-MOL 学术Management Research Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Possibilities for assessing authentic leadership competencies: testing existing instruments and proposing an extended one
Management Research Review Pub Date : 2021-09-22 , DOI: 10.1108/mrr-04-2021-0277
Artur Meerits 1 , Kurmet Kivipõld 2 , Isaac Nana Akuffo 2
Affiliation  

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is twofold: to test existing Authentic Leadership (AL) instruments simultaneously in the same environment, and based on these, to propose an extended instrument for the assessment of AL intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies.

Design/methodology/approach

Three existing instruments of AL – Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) (Walumbwa et al., 2008), Authentic Leadership Inventory (ALI) (Neider and Schriesheim, 2011) and the Three Pillar Model (TPM) (Beddoes-Jones and Swailes, 2015) – were tested, and an extended instrument was proposed based on the results. Two different samples were used – a homogeneous sample (N = 1021) from the military and a heterogeneous sample (N = 547) from retail, catering, public services and logistics industries. Construct validity for the instruments was assessed using a confirmatory factor analysis, and the internal consistency of the factors was analysed using Cronbach’s alpha.

Findings

From existing instruments, two out of three indicate issues with internal factor consistency and model fit. The internal consistency of factors and model fit of the extended instrument developed here is satisfactory and suitable for assessing authentic leadership competencies in a single organisation or industry.

Originality/value

This paper sees AL as the behaviour of leaders affected by leadership competencies. Three existing AL instruments were tested alongside a proposed extended instrument to assess AL intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies in the same context.



中文翻译:

评估真实领导能力的可能性:测试现有工具并提出扩展工具

目的

本文的目的是双重的:在相同的环境中同时测试现有的真实领导(AL)工具,并在此基础上,提出一个扩展的工具来评估 AL 内部和人际能力。

设计/方法/方法

三种现有的 AL 工具——真实领导力问卷 (ALQ) (Walumbwa et al. , 2008)、真实领导力问卷 (ALI) (Neider and Schriesheim, 2011) 和三支柱模型 (TPM) (Beddoes-Jones and Swailes, 2015) ) – 进行了测试,并根据结果提出了扩展仪器。使用了两种不同的样本——来自军队的同质样本 ( N = 1021) 和来自零售、餐饮、公共服务和物流行业的异质样本 ( N = 547)。使用验证性因素分析评估工具的结构效度,并使用 Cronbach's alpha 分析因素的内部一致性。

发现

从现有的工具中,三分之二表明内部因素一致性和模型拟合存在问题。这里开发的扩展工具的因素和模型拟合的内部一致性是令人满意的,并且适合评估单个组织或行业中的真正领导能力。

原创性/价值

本文将 AL 视为受领导能力影响的领导者的行为。三个现有的 AL 工具与提议的扩展工具一起进行了测试,以在相同的背景下评估 AL 的个人和人际能力。

更新日期:2021-09-22
down
wechat
bug