Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review study that aimed to map how the scientific literature is characterized concerning family or couple interventions and therapies regarding lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) individuals. The searches were conducted in the Web of Science, BVS, PsycINFO, and PUBMED databases, from 2009 to 2019, in Portuguese and English. The PRISMA protocol guidelines were followed and the CONSORT Statement and its extension for non-pharmacological interventions instruments were used. Frequencies and content analysis were performed at software NVivo. After considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, gender-nonconforming19 articles were retrieved. The results revealed a greater focus on the North American context, mainly on psychoeducational interventions that worked on marital status and family systems with LGB teenagers or young adults. Adaptation of well-consolidated practical approaches was the most used and multiple formats were applied to conduct interventions, using film-based, cognitive-behavioral and systemic techniques. It is argued that theoretical and empirical research focused on stigma and discrimination at marital and family levels is needed in other contexts, such as Global South countries. Future directions and limitations are presented.

摘要

本文介绍了一项系统回顾性研究，旨在绘制科学文献如何描述有关女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋 (LGB) 个体的家庭或夫妻干预和治疗的特征。从 2009 年到 2019 年，这些搜索是在 Web of Science、BVS、PsycINFO 和 PUBMED 数据库中以葡萄牙语和英语进行的。遵循 PRISMA 协议指南，并使用了 CONSORT 声明及其对非药物干预工具的扩展。频率和内容分析在软件 NVivo 上进行。在考虑纳入和排除标准后，检索了性别不符合的文章。结果显示，人们更加关注北美背景，主要是针对 LGB 青少年或年轻人的婚姻状况和家庭系统的心理教育干预。最常用的是整合完善的实用方法，并采用多种格式进行干预，使用基于电影的认知行为和系统技术。有人认为，在其他情况下，例如全球南方国家，需要对婚姻和家庭层面的耻辱和歧视进行理论和实证研究。提出了未来的方向和限制。有人认为，在其他情况下，例如全球南方国家，需要对婚姻和家庭层面的耻辱和歧视进行理论和实证研究。提出了未来的方向和限制。有人认为，在其他情况下，例如全球南方国家，需要对婚姻和家庭层面的耻辱和歧视进行理论和实证研究。提出了未来的方向和限制。