In this article, we engage with environmental conflicts on indigenous land through a focus on an attempt to gain social licence to reopen and operate the Biedjovággi mine in Guovdageainnu/Kautokeino in Sápmi, Norway. We argue that mining prospects bring forth ontological conflicts concerning land use, as well as ways to know the landscape and the envisioned future that the land holds. It is a story of a conflict between two different ways of knowing. The paper explores the Sámi landscape through different concepts, practices and stories. We then contrast this to the way the same landscape is understood and narrated by a mining company, through the programmes and documents produced according to the Norwegian law and standards. We follow Ingold’s argument that the Sámi landscape practices are taskscapes, where places, times and tasks are interconnected. These were not acknowledged in the plans and documents of the mining company. We conclude by addressing the tendency of extractive industries to reduce different landscapes in ways that fit with modern understandings, which oppose culture to nature.

中文翻译：

---

Biedjovággi 的多重景观：土著土地上的本体论冲突

在本文中，我们通过关注获得社会许可以重新开放和运营位于挪威 Sápmi 的 Guovdageainnu/Kautokeino 的 Biedjovággi 矿场来解决土著土地上的环境冲突。我们认为，采矿前景会引发关于土地利用的本体论冲突，以及了解土地景观和设想未来的方式。这是一个关于两种不同认识方式之间冲突的故事。该论文通过不同的概念、实践和故事探索了萨米人的景观。然后，我们将其与矿业公司通过根据挪威法律和标准制作的程序和文件理解和叙述同一景观的方式进行对比。我们遵循英戈尔德的论点，即萨米人的景观实践是任务景观，地方，时间和任务是相互关联的。这些在矿业公司的计划和文件中没有得到承认。最后，我们解决了采掘业以符合现代理解的方式减少不同景观的趋势，这些理解将文化与自然对立起来。