Purpose: 

This study examined the feasibility of embedding a 4-wk intervention, which sought to reduce sedentary time (SED), into a pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Methods: 

This was an intervention study that comprised one face-to-face session and three follow-up visits. Primary outcomes related to feasibility and included adherence to data completion undertaken before and during the intervention period, participant satisfaction with the intervention (out of 100%), and participant achievement of intervention goals. Secondary outcomes, collected before and after the intervention period, included SED and daily step count.

Results: 

Of 28 eligible individuals approached to participate, 21 (75%) were enrolled and 19 (90%) completed the program (13 females; age 69.1 ± 8.7 yr). Sixteen participants (84%) were adherent to wearing a physical activity monitor before and during the intervention period. The satisfaction score was 90 ± 12%. Over the intervention period, a total of 73 intervention goals were set, of which 41 (56%) were achieved. The effect of the intervention on SED was unclear.

Conclusions: 

Embedding this intervention in a PRP appears to be feasible; however, its impact on SED should be further evaluated.

中文翻译：

---

在肺康复计划中嵌入旨在减少久坐时间的行为改变计划对 COPD 患者是可行的

目的： 

本研究探讨了将旨在减少久坐时间 (SED) 的 4 周干预纳入慢性阻塞性肺病患者的肺康复计划 (PRP) 的可行性。

方法： 

这是一项干预研究，包括一次面对面会议和三次随访。与可行性相关的主要结果包括在干预期间和干预期间坚持完成数据、参与者对干预的满意度（100%）以及参与者实现干预目标。在干预期前后收集的次要结果包括 SED 和每日步数。

结果： 

在 28 名符合条件的人中，有 21 人 (75%) 被录取，19 人 (90%) 完成了该计划（13 名女性；年龄 69.1 ± 8.7 岁）。16 名参与者 (84%) 在干预前和干预期间坚持佩戴身体活动监测器。满意度得分为 90 ± 12%。在干预期间，共设定了73个干预目标，其中41个（56%）实现了。干预对 SED 的影响尚不清楚。

结论： 

在 PRP 中嵌入这种干预似乎是可行的；然而，它对 SED 的影响应进一步评估。