Marine Geology ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-14 , DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2021.106634 Andrea Argnani 1
In their paper Schambach et al. (2020) present a dual (seismic and landslide source) modelling of the 1908 Messina tsunami. Their contribution highlights the fact that a multiple source is required to model the 1908 tsunami event. However, both the seismogenic fault and the submarine mass failure adopted by Schambach et al. are geologically poorly constrained. Dual-source modelling can satisfactorily fit to observations but the source components should be based on geological ground. Various authors have explored the contribution of submarine landslides into the 1908 tsunami generation; it could also be of interest, however, to consider the possible tsunamigenic contribution of secondary faults.
中文翻译:
L. Schambach, ST Grilli, DR Tappin, MD Gangemi, G. Barbaro 对“1908 年墨西拿海啸双重地震和深海大规模破坏源的新模拟和理解”发表评论 [海洋地质学 421 (2020) 106093]
在他们的论文 Schambach 等人中。(2020) 提出了 1908 年墨西拿海啸的双重(地震和滑坡源)模型。他们的贡献突出了一个事实,即需要多个来源来模拟 1908 年海啸事件。然而,Schambach 等人所采用的发震断层和海底质量破坏都没有受到影响。地质约束很差。双源建模可以令人满意地适应观测,但源组件应基于地质地面。许多作者探索了海底滑坡对 1908 年海啸产生的影响;然而,考虑次生断层可能引发海啸的作用也可能令人感兴趣。