In discussions about ‘race’, empire, imperialism – and the decolonisation of the curriculum in European universities – the discipline of Romani Studies has, until recently, been relatively quiet. This article seeks to address this silence and offers commentary on the institutional silences, via both disciplinary historical and contemporary country-specific analysis. A case study is investigated to tease out the ontological and epistemological transitions from early 19th Century Gypsylorism to 21st Century Critical Romani Studies: the teaching and learning of Romani Studies at the Central European University (CEU) in Budapest. We argue that the legacy of Gypsylorism, as much as the political climate in which the teaching and learning of contemporary Romani Studies occurs, are important aspects to consider. In moving forwards, we suggest that the models and pedagogies adopted at CEU since 2015 offer a useful and critical template for other universities and departments to consider adopting in progressing Romani knowledge production.

中文翻译：

---

参与非殖民化，应对安提吉普赛主义：匈牙利中欧大学罗姆语研究的经验教训

在关于“种族”、帝国、帝国主义以及欧洲大学课程的非殖民化的讨论中，罗姆人研究学科直到最近还相对安静。本文试图通过学科历史和当代国家特定分析来解决这种沉默，并就制度性沉默提供评论。研究了一个案例研究，以梳理出从 19 年初开始的本体论和认识论转变th世纪吉普赛到 21英石世纪关键罗姆人研究：布达佩斯中欧大学 (CEU) 的罗姆人研究教学和学习。我们认为，吉普赛人的遗产，以及当代罗姆人研究的教学和学习所处的政治气候，都是需要考虑的重要方面。在前进的过程中，我们建议 CEU 自 2015 年以来采用的模型和教学法为其他大学和部门考虑在推进罗姆语知识生产中采用提供了一个有用且重要的模板。