Abstract

From the point of view of the development of basic terminology, the state of library science can be described as unsatisfactory. Key library science terms are created with violations of the logical rules of classification of concepts. First of all, this applies to the key terms “library,” “library-information,” “information-library,” which are considered in some cases as synonymous and in others as subordinate. However, they are not such in any approach. This article sets out the logical rules for distinguishing the types of theoretical concepts, and analyzes the listed initial terms of library science on this basis. It is concluded that any combination of the words “library” and “information” contradicts the logical rules and norms of word formation in the Russian language. Arguments are given in favor of a balanced and limited use of the terms “information resource,” “information function” and the call is made to build library terminology considering the actual exact meaning of the entered professional terms and their meanings. The author considers the urgent need to rework the main terminological GOST SIBID, which has existed for more than 20 years and has entered into a mismatch with later terminological standards in this system, dedicated to specific issues of librarianship.

中文翻译：

---

论遵守语言规范创建图书馆术语

摘要

从基础术语的发展来看，图书馆学的现状可谓不尽人意。关键图书馆学术语的创建违反了概念分类的逻辑规则。首先，这适用于关键术语“图书馆”、“图书馆信息”、“信息图书馆”，它们在某些情况下被视为同义词，而在其他情况下被视为从属。然而，它们在任何方法中都不是这样。本文阐述了区分理论概念类型的逻辑规则，并在此基础上分析了列出的图书馆学初始术语。结论是，“图书馆”和“信息”这两个词的任何组合都与俄语中构词的逻辑规则和规范相矛盾。支持平衡和有限地使用术语“信息资源”、“信息功能”的论据，并呼吁建立图书馆术语，考虑输入的专业术语的实际确切含义及其含义。作者认为迫切需要修改主要术语 GOST SIBID，该术语已存在 20 多年，并与该系统中后来的术语标准不匹配，专门针对图书馆学的具体问题。