当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Card. Surg. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Trifecta versus perimount bioprosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement; systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Cardiac Surgery ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-09 , DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15972
Yujiro Yokoyama 1 , Toshiki Kuno 2, 3 , Hisato Takagi 4 , Shinichi Fukuhara 5
Affiliation  

Recent studies suggested higher rates of early structural valve degeneration or reintervention for the Trifecta valve compared to other valves. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of the Trifecta valve and the Perimount valves in patients who underwent a surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

中文翻译:

Trifecta 与周围生物假体用于外科主动脉瓣置换术;系统评价和荟萃分析

最近的研究表明,与其他瓣膜相比,Trifecta 瓣膜的早期结构性瓣膜变性或再介入率更高。因此,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较了接受手术主动脉瓣置换术 (SAVR) 的患者使用 Trifecta 瓣膜和 Perimount 瓣膜的结果。
更新日期:2021-10-01
down
wechat
bug