This study of the relationships between spaces and stories reconsiders the common conception of architecture as a constructive art that shapes buildings and streets, so that they accommodate and represent the patterns of our lives. I imagine it will not be controversial to say that architectural works are fabricated. But when it is said they are made, possibly few will understand what I shall suggest: that they are made-up much the way stories are, that the two, stories and spaces are sibling fictions. Architectural construction is obviously productive. New buildings are added to the urban and rural topographies we occupy, to satisfy previously unmet desires. Can it be said that stories are similarly additive, altering, and enhancing, because they intensify emotions, deepen understanding, and enrich character? Are their influences similarly public? A few definitions will help me address these and related questions.

这项对空间和故事之间关系的研究重新考虑了建筑作为塑造建筑物和街道的建设性艺术的共同概念，以便它们适应和代表我们的生活模式。我想说建筑作品是捏造的应该不会有争议。但是当说它们是编造的时，可能很少有人会理解我的建议：它们的编造方式与故事的大致相同，故事和空间两者是兄弟小说. 建筑施工显然是富有成效的。新建筑被添加到我们占据的城市和乡村地形中，以满足以前未满足的愿望。能否说故事同样具有附加性、改变性和增强性，因为它们可以增强情感、加深理解和丰富角色？他们的影响是否同样公开？一些定义将帮助我解决这些和相关问题。