当前位置: X-MOL 学术American Criminal Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Duren, Pope Francis, and the Death Penalty: How Catholics Can Render the Capital Jury Selection Process Unconstitutional
American Criminal Law Review ( IF 3.455 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-01
Dan Villalba

Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response to the gravity of certain crimes and an acceptable, albeit extreme, means of safeguarding the common good. Today, however, there is an increasing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes. In addition, a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state. Lastly, more effective systems of detention have been developed, which ensure the due pro-tection of citizens but, at the same time, do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption. Consequently, the Church teaches, in light of the Gospel, that the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person, and she works for its abolition worldwide.

中文翻译:

杜伦、教皇弗朗西斯和死刑:天主教徒如何使陪审团遴选程序违宪

合法当局在公正审判后诉诸死刑,长期以来被认为是对某些罪行严重性的适当回应,也是一种可以接受但极端的维护公共利益的手段。然而,如今人们越来越意识到,即使在犯下非常严重的罪行之后,人的尊严也不会丧失。此外,人们对国家实施刑事制裁的重要性有了新的认识。最后,制定了更有效的拘留制度,确保公民得到应有的保护,但同时也不会完全剥夺罪犯获得救赎的可能性。因此,教会根据福音教导:
更新日期:2020-09-01
down
wechat
bug