当前位置: X-MOL 学术Modern Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The CJEU in Commission v Hungary Higher Education Defends Academic Freedom Through WTO Provisions
Modern Law Review ( IF 1.540 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-02 , DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12686
Andi Hoxhaj 1
Affiliation  

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Commission v Hungary Higher Education ruled that the legal conditions introduced to enable foreign higher education institutions to carry out their activities in Hungary are incompatible with EU law. The Commission referred Hungary to the CJEU, claiming that the amendments to the Higher Education Act of 2011 are incompatible with Hungary's commitments as a member of the EU within the following frameworks: the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS); the freedom of establishment; the free movement of services; the provisions of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights relating to academic freedom; the freedom to found higher education institutions; and the freedom to conduct a business. This note explains that Commission v Hungary Higher Education is the latest example of the ongoing efforts in Hungary to undermine the rule of law and threaten academic freedom in the EU

中文翻译:

欧洲法院在委员会诉匈牙利高等教育案中通过 WTO 条款捍卫学术自由

欧盟法院 (CJEU) 在委员会匈牙利高等教育案中裁定,为使外国高等教育机构能够在匈牙利开展活动而引入的法律条件不符合欧盟法律。委员会将匈牙利提交给 CJEU,声称 2011 年《高等教育法》的修正案不符合匈牙利在以下框架内作为欧盟成员的承诺:服务贸易总协定 (GATS);设立自由;服务的自由流动;《欧盟基本权利宪章》中有关学术自由的规定;建立高等教育机构的自由;以及开展业务的自由。本说明解释说委员会匈牙利高等教育是匈牙利正在努力破坏欧盟法治和威胁学术自由的最新例证
更新日期:2021-09-02
down
wechat
bug