当前位置: X-MOL 学术Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of isotope ratio mass spectrometry and cavity ring-down spectroscopy procedures and precision of the doubly labeled water method in different physiological specimens
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry ( IF 2 ) Pub Date : 2021-09-01 , DOI: 10.1002/rcm.9188
Hiroyuki Sagayama 1, 2 , Natalie M Racine 2 , Timothy C Shriver 2 , Dale A Schoeller 2, 3
Affiliation  

This study determines if saliva collection procedures for the doubly labeled water (DLW) method, used for measuring total energy expenditure (TEE), are comparable to urine and plasma collection. Both the cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) and isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) analyses techniques are compared.

中文翻译:

同位素比质谱法和空腔衰荡光谱法程序及双标水法在不同生理标本中精度的比较

本研究确定用于测量总能量消耗 (TEE) 的双重标记水 (DLW) 方法的唾液采集程序是否与尿液和血浆采集相当。腔衰荡光谱 (CRDS) 和同位素比质谱 (IRMS) 分析技术进行了比较。
更新日期:2021-09-20
down
wechat
bug