当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Clin. Oncol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Assessment of button-type jejunostomy for nutritional management after esophagectomy in 201 cases
International Journal of Clinical Oncology ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-31 , DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-02022-7
Yoshitaka Ishikawa 1 , Katsunori Nishikawa 1 , Naoko Fukushima 1 , Keita Takahashi 1 , Yako Hasegawa 2 , Masami Yuda 1 , Yuichiro Tanishima 1 , Toru Ikegami 1
Affiliation  

Background

Many surgeons preferably place a trans-nasal feeding tube or a feeding enterostomy for post-operative nutritional management after esophagectomy. Various types of tubes (such as nasogastric, transgastric, transduodenal, or transjejunal tubes) have been used for enteral feeding; however, the appropriate enteral feeding routes have not yet been proposed. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of button-type jejunostomy.

Methods

We reviewed 201 patients who underwent esophagectomy with placement of a button-type jejunostomy at the Jikei University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) between 2008 and 2019. The analyzed variables included clinicopathological characteristics, operative data, jejunostomy-related characteristics, and postoperative complications. Postoperative bodyweight loss was examined 6 months and 1 year after the operation.

Results

Refractory enterocutaneous fistula and bowel obstruction occurred in 13 (6.5%) and 14 (7.0%) patients, respectively. The body mass index at button-type jejunostomy removal was significantly lower and the duration of button-type jejunostomy placement was significantly longer in patients with a refractory enterocutaneous fistula (p = 0.023 and p < 0.001, respectively). Bowel obstruction was significantly more likely to develop in patients with a non-squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.021) and in patients who underwent open abdominal procedures (p < 0.001). After 1 year, the median bodyweight losses were 12.1% and 15.6% in patients with short and long jejunostomy placement durations (p = 0.642), respectively.

Conclusion

A button-type jejunostomy is durable and allows easy self-management for maintaining the bodyweight without any adverse events. However, it is strongly recommended that the button be removed within a year to prevent refractory enterocutaneous fistula formation.



中文翻译:

纽扣式空肠造口术201例食管切除术后营养管理评价

背景

许多外科医生更喜欢放置经鼻饲管或饲喂肠造口术,用于食管切除术后的术后营养管理。各种类型的管子(如鼻胃管、经胃管、经十二指肠管或经空肠管)已被用于肠内喂养;然而,尚未提出适当的肠内喂养途径。因此,本研究旨在评估纽扣式空肠造口术的可行性和安全性。

方法

我们回顾了 2008 年至 2019 年在滋庆大学医院(日本东京)接受食管切除术和纽扣式空肠造口术的患者。 分析的变量包括临床病理特征、手术数据、空肠造口术相关特征和术后并发症。术后 6 个月和 1 年检查术后体重减轻情况。

结果

分别有 13 名 (6.5%) 和 14 名 (7.0%) 患者发生难治性肠皮瘘和肠梗阻。在难治性肠皮瘘患者中,纽扣式空肠造口术移除时的体重指数显着降低,纽扣式空肠造口术放置的持续时间显着延长(分别为p  = 0.023 和p  < 0.001)。非鳞状细胞癌患者 ( p  = 0.021) 和接受开腹手术的患者 ( p  < 0.001)更容易发生肠梗阻。1 年后,空肠造口术放置时间短和长的患者的体重减轻中位数分别为 12.1% 和 15.6% ( p  = 0.642)。

结论

纽扣式空肠造口术经久耐用,可以轻松自我管理以保持体重,而不会出现任何不良事件。然而,强烈建议在一年内移除按钮以防止难治性肠皮瘘形成。

更新日期:2021-08-31
down
wechat
bug