当前位置: X-MOL 学术Review of Policy Research › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The advocacy coalition framework in Japan: Contributions to policy process studies and the challenges involved
Review of Policy Research ( IF 2.328 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-31 , DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12446
Tomohiko Ohno 1 , Naoko Hirayama 2 , Keito Mineo 3 , Kengo Iwata 4 , Izumi Inasawa 5
Affiliation  

The advocacy coalition framework (ACF), a unified framework for understanding the policy process, has been applied in various countries and regions; however, there are few contributions from Japan, despite seemingly favorable conditions for applying it. An exploration of what hinders ACF applications in Japan is worthwhile for developing the ACF as a framework for comparative policy process studies across various social and political settings. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review previous Japanese ACF studies. Our review found that Japanese ACF studies are fewer in number, have less coverage of policy fields, and have less methodological diversity and transparency than international trends. While most of the Japanese ACF studies supported the basic hypotheses of the ACF, we found a need to refine some hypotheses and research methods of the ACF studies. We also discuss the background factors in the inactivity of ACF studies in Japan and suggest solutions for it.

中文翻译:

日本的倡导联盟框架:对政策过程研究的贡献和所涉及的挑战

倡导联盟框架(ACF)是理解政策过程的统一框架,已在各个国家和地区得到应用;然而,尽管应用它的条件看似有利,但日本的贡献却很少。探索在日本阻碍 ACF 应用的因素对于将 ACF 发展为跨各种社会和政治环境进行比较政策过程研究的框架是值得的。因此,本研究旨在系统回顾以往日本 ACF 研究。我们的审查发现,与国际趋势相比,日本 ACF 研究的数量较少,政策领域的覆盖面较少,方法的多样性和透明度也较低。虽然大多数日本 ACF 研究支持 ACF 的基本假设,我们发现需要改进 ACF 研究的一些假设和研究方法。我们还讨论了日本 ACF 研究不活跃的背景因素,并提出了解决方案。
更新日期:2021-08-31
down
wechat
bug